

One of the most unusual doctrines that I have read about, is that of soul sleep. This is a belief held by certain religious groups such as the Jehovah Witnesses which makes the claim that when one dies their soul sleeps until their body is resurrected upon the second coming of Christ. Now, when I first heard of this theory I immediately dismissed it as not only non-Biblical, but unsound. After all, when we die we all know that our souls are instantaneously transported to either Heaven, the place where the saints of the Lord go, or Hell, a place of eternal torment for the unbelievers. However, I must admit that upon considering the nature of the soul and the body, I was a little confused with the process. For instance, why is it that our souls need to be reunited with our physical bodies? For most of us, we think of Heaven as being the final destination of our souls, to where, the prospect of being brought back to a physical reality employs a most disagreeable situation. The bottom line is this, first, why is it that Heaven is characterized in Scripture as being our eternal dwelling place, yet, it also states that we are to be resurrected in the body? Does this imply that the Bible is being inconsistent in dealing with our ultimate destinies? And lastly, why must we go to Heaven when we are only going to be brought back to earth, albeit, a perfected one, as is made clear in Isaiah 65:17-25?
Initially, when dealing with life after death, there is this image of there being another place, separate with and unconnected to, our physical world. This would be what we think of as Heaven or Hell. The Bible tell us in Corinthians 5:6 that “we are confident, yes, well pleased rather to be absent from the body and to be present with the Lord.� As this implies, when we die, our disembodied souls go to another place, another side of reality where dwells our Lord. Furthermore, this is during the period of time we, who are still alive, dwell in this physical world. We know this because Jesus, in the gospels, spoke of a beggar named Lazarus who dwelt in such a place after his death. However, according to those who believe in soul sleep (the belief that when one dies their soul sleeps until the resurrection-and their consciousness thus awakens contemporaneously to a new body), the soul is not conscious during this period. Yet, this can not be the case, since, there are accounts in Scripture of individuals who exist in one place while we who are alive exist in another. Then, the Bible is clear that when we die, we go to Heaven without a body.
And even more, the Bible promises that the soul will be reunited with the body. In 1 Corinthians 15:51-53 it says that “we shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed…� Though, I would like to stop right here and clarify something. It is necessary to understand that Paul is not communicating a doctrine of soul sleep. Sleep, as the term is used here, is done so in the same sense as, when in the Old Testament, people died they were viewed as sleeping. This does not mean that they were literally sleeping. In the same manner as Jesus illustrated with the story of Lazarus the beggar, people who die go somewhere although their body sleeps. With this in mind, the passage goes on to say that “for the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed, for this corruptible must put on incorruptible, and this mortal must put on immortality.� In short, the body dies away, we go to either Heaven or Hell, and then in the resurrection we are reunited with our bodies that are glorified and incorruptible.
But, for many of us, we often wonder why it is that this whole process is necessary. After all, our souls go to be with the Lord. And, is not Heaven where He dwells? Why should we wish to be sucked back down to an earthly dwelling when, as Jesus promised, “In [His] Father’s house there are many mansions…I go to prepare a place for you (John 14:3)� Is not the resurrected earth still somehow unconnected to Heaven and where our Lord is? Remember however, in the beginning, Adam’s intimate relationship with God was so pure and holy that there was nothing that separated Adam from Him. Why should the new earth be any different? We think of the physical world as being somehow located below Heaven, but I propose that when it is renewed, it will be like it probably was, surrounded by it, not beneath it. Earth may be God’s footstool now, but it may have been something more like His table where he sat with humanity face to face. So, the resurrection is not taking us from Heaven, it is more like putting in a few extra rooms on our homes. We will never be taken from His presence; we will just be given more places to be with Him. Heaven will be, in a sense, physical and spiritual.
Send This To A Friend
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://s27498.gridserver.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/322








































Comments
I think it's important to note that nothing is purely spiritual. God's desire for us is to not be just spiritual floating entities, but alive physical bodies, completely made perfect while still being in bodily form. Look at the resurrection of Christ. Surely, he went to be with the Father (in Heaven?), but he also ascended while still being 100% human. The early church fathers, such as Gregory of Nyssa, taught early on both the enternality of the soul, and the resurrection of the body. Why do we see the need to abandon either?
Posted by: Michael Cline | July 29, 2006 12:07 PM
One view that I heard entertained is this: the notion of a disembodied soul was a greek idea, related to the platonic notion of an immaterial soul. Paul, in Corintihains I, goes through great effort to adjust the Corinthians belief in this immaterial soul. He tells them rather explicity that they will be resurrected, in full body, and that they should give up their Greek beliefs that were spilling over into the original Christian view.
I don't know myself. And, I don't think it's nescesarry to know for salvation (since we simply need to accept Christ as our saviour), but it is an interesting idea to entertain noetheless. Any thoughts?
Posted by: Anonymous | April 15, 2007 10:19 PM